翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ 2006 interim constitution of Thailand
・ 2006 InterLiga
・ 2006 International Darts League
・ 2006 International Fight League
・ 2006 International League season
・ 2006 International Pokka 1000km
・ 2006 International Rally Challenge season
・ 2006 International Rules Series
・ 2006 Internazionali BNL d'Italia
・ 2006 Internazionali BNL d'Italia – Men's Doubles
・ 2006 Internazionali BNL d'Italia – Men's Singles
・ 2006 Internazionali BNL d'Italia – Women's Doubles
・ 2006 Internazionali BNL d'Italia – Women's Singles
・ 2006 Iowa Hawkeyes football team
・ 2006 Iowa State Cyclones football team
2006 Iranian sumptuary law controversy
・ 2006 Iraqi government formation
・ 2006 IRB Nations Cup
・ 2006 IRB Pacific 5 Nations
・ 2006 Ireland rugby union tour of New Zealand and Australia
・ 2006 Ironman World Championship
・ 2006 ISF Women's World Championship
・ 2006 Islamist demonstration outside the Embassy of Denmark in London
・ 2006 Isle of Man TT
・ 2006 Israeli reserve soldiers' protest
・ 2006 ISSF World Cup
・ 2006 ISSF World Shooting Championships
・ 2006 Istanbul Cup – Doubles
・ 2006 Italian Chamber of Deputies election, North and Central American division
・ 2006 Italian Figure Skating Championships


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

2006 Iranian sumptuary law controversy : ウィキペディア英語版
2006 Iranian sumptuary law controversy

On May 19, 2006, the ''National Post'' of Canada published pieces by Amir Taheri alleging that the Iranian parliament had passed a sumptuary law mandating a national dress code for all Iranians, Muslim and non-Muslim alike.
Both ''National Post'' articles went on to say that non-Muslim religious minorities in Iran would be required to wear "special insignia": yellow for Jews, red for Christians and blue for Zoroastrian. According to the article by Taheri, "()he new codes would enable Muslims to easily recognize non-Muslims so that they can avoid shaking hands with them by mistake, and thus becoming najis (unclean)." According to both articles, Iranian Muslims would have to wear "standard Islamic garments".
Numerous other sources, including Maurice Motamed, the Jewish member of the Iranian parliament and the Iranian Embassy in Canada, refuted the report as untrue. The ''National Post'' later retracted the original article ("Iran eyes badges for Jews: Law would require non-Muslim insignia") and published an article, to the contrary ("Experts say reports of badges for Jews in Iran is untrue").
The original article listed only "human rights groups" and "Iranian expatriates living in Canada" as its sources. Amir Taheri made a statement on May 22 saying the National Post story he authored was used by "a number of reports that somehow jumped the gun" and that he stands by the article. Amir states he raised the issue "not as a news story" but rather "as an opinion column".
The Associated Press later refuted the ''Post'' report as well, saying that "a draft law moving through parliament encourages Iranians to wear Islamic clothing to protect the country's Muslim identity but does not mention special attire for religious minorities, according to a copy obtained Saturday by The Associated Press." Reuters also reported that "A copy of the bill obtained by Reuters contained no such references. Reuters correspondents who followed the dress code session in parliament as it was broadcast on state radio heard no discussion of proscriptions for religious minorities."
Finally on May 24, 2006, the ''National Post'' issues an apology for the untrue reports that the Iranian law would "require Jews and other religious minorities in Iran to wear badges". "It is now clear the story is not true," wrote Editor-in-chief Douglas Kelly in a long editorial appearing on Page 2. "We apologize for the mistake and for the consternation it has caused not just ''National Post'' readers, but the broader public who read the story."〔("Our mistake: Note to readers" ), ''National Post'', May 24, 2006〕
== Refutation ==
In the follow-up article "Experts say reports of badges for Jews in Iran is untrue", the ''National Post'' quotes Meir Javedanfar, an Israeli expert on Iran and the Middle East:
Meir Javdanfar, an Israeli expert on Iran and the Middle East who was born and raised in Tehran, said yesterday that he was unable to find any evidence that such a law had been passed.
“None of my sources in Iran have heard of this,” he said. “I don’t know where this comes from.”
Mr. Javdanfar said that not all clauses of the law had been passed through the parliament and said the requirement that Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians wear special insignia might be part of an older version of the Islamic dress law, which was first written two years ago.
“In any case, there is no way that they could have forced Iranian Jews to wear this,” he added. “The Iranian people would never stand for it.”〔

...as did the news radio station AM 940 Montreal.
"()ndependent reporter Meir Javedanfar, an Israeli Middle East expert who was born and raised in Tehran, says the report is false.
"It's absolutely factually incorrect," he told The New 940 Montreal.
"Nowhere in the law is there any talk of Jews and Christians having to wear different colours. I've checked it with sources both inside Iran and outside."
"The Iranian people would never stand for it. The Iranian government wouldn't be stupid enough to do it."

The ''National Post'' also quotes the London-based Iranian commentator Ali Reza Nourizadeh:
"Ali Reza Nourizadeh, an Iranian commentator on political affairs in London, suggested that the requirements for badges or insignia for religious minorities was part of a “secondary motion” introduced in parliament, addressing the changes specific to the attire of people of various religious backgrounds.
Mr. Nourizadeh said that motion was very minor and was far from being passed into law.
That account could not be confirmed."〔


According to Sam Kermanian, secretary general of the Iranian American Jewish Federation, his contacts in the Iranian Jewish community, including Maurice Motamed, said that there was no such law. ''The New York Sun'' quoted Kermanian as saying that "We have not been able to confirm the accuracy of the report, nonetheless we are pursuing this issue with concern()"
According to Agence France-Presse,
"This report is a complete fabrication and is totally false," Maurice Motammed told AFP in Tehran. "It is a lie, and the people who invented it wanted to make political gain" by doing so.
....
Motammed said he had been present in parliament when a bill to promote "an Iranian and Islamic style of dress for women" was voted. "In the law, there is no mention of religious minorities," he added.
MPs representing Iran's Jewish, Christian and Zoroastrian minorities sit on all parliamentary committees, particularly the cultural one, he said.
"This is an insult to the Iranian people and to religious minorities in Iran," he said.

According to the Toronto Star,
"In a phone interview from Tel Aviv, Israeli commentator and Iranian exile Meir Jawadnafar angrily dismissed the story as "baseless." Toronto-based Iranian blogger Hossein Derkhshan said he could find no evidence of any such plans.
Repeated calls to Post editor-in-chief Doug Kelly went unreturned. The paper's website ran a story headlined "Experts say report of badges ... is untrue.""


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「2006 Iranian sumptuary law controversy」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.